Get Permission Chaudhry: Drug withdrawal a common feature attributed to patient safety

At the end of the day, the goals are simple, safety and security

Need For Withdrawing Drug From The Market

Unexpected adverse effects, or SUSARs (untoward and unintended response to a study drug, which is not listed is the applicable product information) harmful interactions, continued irrational use and not adequate risk management plan for the marketed product.1 The adverse effects are detected though a process of regular monitoring after the drug is released called pharmacovigilance, which is now dominant process in country regulated through Pharmacovigilance Programme in India, which is steered by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, New Delhi. Fixed dose combinations are nearly 4 times more in India, than the developed countries, the basic reason for their introduction into market was better drug compliance, rather taking the two drugs separately. In the domestic market, FDCs (Fixed drug combinations) were contributing to > 50 % sales in the market. The rationality of FDC is not known much to clinicians. The Drugs Technical Advisory Board recommended that "there is no therapeutic justification" for the ingredients contained in the 344 FDC drugs and that these medicines "may involve risk to human beings".2 and thus these were removed from Indian market in March 15th 2016.3

Spectrum of withdrawal

The drugs withdrawn globally in the past decade were nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (28%), antidiabetics (14.28%), antiobesity (14.28%), antihistamines (14.28%), prokinetic drugs (7.14%), breast cancer and infertility drugs (7.14%), irritable bowel syndrome and constipation drugs (7.14%) and antibiotics (7.14%).4 The widely used anti-obesity drugs fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine have been recalled in the various countries in the wake of continuing reports that their use is contributing to heart-valve defects. Most of the drugs that affect monoamine neurotransmitters licensed for the treatment of obesity over the past 65 years have been withdrawn because of adverse reactions.

Drugs may be withdrawn even after they are available in the market for a decade or longer. Examples of such drugs include are Rosiglitazone, Rofecoxib, Gatifloxacin, and Rimonabent formulations used in the market over a decade.

Table 1

Chronology of drug withdrawal of some vital molecules

Drug

Therapeutic Class

Year Withdrawn from Market

Prenylamine

Angina

1988

Terodiline

Urinary Incontinence

1991

Sparfloxacin

Antibiotic

1996

Terafenadine

Antispsychotic

1998

Sertindole

Antipsychotic

1998

Astemizole

Antihitamine

1999

Grepafloxacin

Antibiotic

1999

Cisapride

Prokinetic

2000

Droperidol

Antipsychotic

2001

Levomethadyl

Opiate Dependence

2003

Propoxyphene

Analgesic

2015

It has been shown that the higher the fluoroquinolone dose ( Sparfloxacin , Grepafloxacin , Moxifloxacin) and serum AUCs, the higher the QT prolongation risk. Moxifloxacin is used to evaluate the drugs which can cause relative QTc prolongation.

There is a paradox, there are certain drugs not available in US and EU but are still marketed in India such as Analgin , Droperidol, Furazolidone, Nitrofurazone, Oxyphenbutazone , Nimesulide and Piperazine. However, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare finally had decided to suspend the pediatric use of the Nimesulide suspension from 10 March 2011 Nimesulide formulations are not indicated for use in children below 12 years of age. The drug was banned in 2000 in various countries like Switzerland, Spain, and United states.5

In 2011, Pioglitazone was withdrawn from the French market owing to a potential risk of bladder cancer. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is informing the public that use of the diabetes medication Actos (pioglitazone) for more than one year may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer.6 Information about this risk will be added to the Warnings and Precautions section of the label for pioglitazone-containing medicines. In India drug was withdrawn from Indian market but was reintroduced in Indian market as safety concern was only in animal studies and there were cost constraints

Figure 1

Depending on toxicity on various organs , the drug withdrawal is categorised

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c5bbb541-abeb-473e-87ed-a0f343fe3227image1.png

As evident from pie, most of drugs have been withdrawn due to Hepatoxicity, Cardiotoxicity, Neurotoxicity and the abnormal Haematological profile.

Recently, FDA has found N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) levels in some ranitidine products increase with time and temperature posing a risk to consumers, and therefore the agency has requested the withdrawal of all ranitidine products from the U.S. market. In September 2019, Ranatidine was withdrawn by many generic companies in India and then it was reintroduced. Sartans such as Candesartan and Olmesartan also have such impurities.

Cerivastatin was approved in 1997 in US. Low doses were effective (0.2mg, 0.3mg and 0,4mg) It is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce elevated Total-C, LDL- C, apo B, and TG and to increase HDL-C levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia High dose cerivastatin {0.8mg) along with Gemfibrozil 600mg caused Rhabdomyolysis in patients. This drug—drug interaction was implicated fatalities in the United States and Spain Cerivastatin was withdrawn on 9th August 2001.7 Cerivastatin was withdrawn from the market because of 52 deaths attributed to drug-related rhabdomyolysis that lead to kidney failure. FDA restricted Rosiglitazone use in February 2010 after studies linked the drug to increased risk of heart attacks. Rosiglitazone was also withdrawn from the New Zealand market in April 2011.  

Financial Implications of drug withdrawal

Monetary loss to marketing company which runs in million of dollars, which comes as process of recall from market and litigations from users and finally the image of corporate needs to be maintained

Source of funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Ahmad I Patel S Sanyal R Balkrishnan G P Mohanta A Study on Drug Safety Monitoring Program in IndiaIndian J Pharm Sci201476537986

2 

3 

A Pariente Y Mansiaux A Jarné F Salvo C Pageot J Bezin Impact of pioglitazone regulatory withdrawal on antidiabetic drug use and health in diabetic patientsEur J Clin Pharmacol2017731216556310.1007/s00228-017-2326-z

4 

R F Begam Y R kumar R Velmurugan Awareness about FDA announcement on voluntary recall of ranitidine among physicians and pharmacists in and around Chennai, India: a cross-sectional studyFuture J Pharm Sci20217112

5 

C D Furberg B Pitt Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world marketCurr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 200125205710.1186/cvm-2-5-205

6 

Complete list of 344 drugs banned by the Ministry of Health Family welfare | National Health Portal Of India2016https://www.nhp.gov.in/Complete-list-of-344-drugs-banned-by-the-Ministry-of-Health-Family-welfare

7 

M Fiona Drug Safety Data Curation and Modeling in ChEMBL: Boxed Warnings and Withdrawn DrugsChem Res Toxicol20183423859510.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00296



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 20-10-2021

Accepted : 27-10-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jpbs.2021.009


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 767

PDF Downloaded: 823