Get Permission Pawar, Mundhe, Deshmukh, Pandhare, and Nandgude: Enrichment of aqueous solubility and dissolution profile of mesalamine: In vitro evaluation of solid dispersion


Introduction

According to Chiou and Riegelman (1971), a solid dispersion is "the dispersion of one or more active ingredients in an inert carrier at solid state prepared by melting (fusion), solvent or the melting-solvent method". The carrier used has traditionally been a water soluble or water miscible polymer such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or low molecular weight materials such as urea, citric acid and mannitol. Solid dispersion is one of the approaches employed to improve dissolution of poorly soluble drugs whose absorption is dissolution rate limited. Solid dispersion (SD) technique has been widely used to improve the dissolution rate, solubility and oral absorption of poorly water soluble drugs. The term solid dispersions have been utilized to describe a family of dosage forms where by the drug is dispersed in a biologically inert matrix, usually with a view to enhancing oral bioavailability.

The oral route of drug administration is the most common and preferred method of delivery due to convenience and ease of ingestion. From a patient’s perspective, swallowing a dosage form is a comfortable and a familiar means of taking medication. As a result, patient compliance and hence drug treatment is typically more effective with orally administered medications as compared with other routes of administration. Limited drug absorption resulting in poor bioavailability is paramount amongst the potential problems that can be encountered when delivering an active agent via the oral route.1, 2 Some proposed mechanisms of the solid dispersion formulations including the solubilizing effect of the carrier, decreased agglomeration and aggregation of drug particles, particle size reduction to molecular size, yielding to solid state solution within carriers and increased drug solubility via complex formation or solubilization and improved wettability.3 Mesalamine is indicated to treat mild to moderate acute exacerbations of ulcerative colitis’s in remission, particularly in patients intolerant of sulphasalazine. It is white to pinkish crystals slightly soluble in water belonging to BCS class II, 20 to 30% absorbed following oral administrations. Due to its poor flow properties as well as low solubility, it is a suitable candidate for formulating solid dispersion.4 In case of drug that is poorly water-soluble, dissolution may be the rate limiting step in the process of drug absorption. Drugs with poor water solubility have been shown to be unpredictably and slowly absorbed compared with the drugs of higher solubility. The purpose of this study was to prepare solid dispersion by solvent evaporation and melting point method to improve the dissolution rate of Mesalamine.

The major drawback of low aqueous solubility is delays its absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Solubility behavior of a drug is one of the key determinants of its oral bioavailability. Noyes- Whitney equation provides some hints as to how the dissolution rate of even very poorly soluble compounds might be improved to minimize the limitations to oral availability.5, 6 Chiou and Riegelman outlined 6 types of drug carrier interactions in solid-state dispersions simple eutectic mixtures, solid solutions, glass solutions and glass suspensions, amorphous precipitates and compound or complex formation. Other factors such as increased wettability, solubilization of the drug by the carrier at the diffusion layer, and the reduction or absence of aggregation and agglomeration may also contribute to increased dissolution.7, 8

The main advantage of the solvent method is thermal decomposition of drugs or carriers can be prevented as the relatively low temperatures required for the evaporation of organic solvents.

Materials and Methods

Mesalamine was received as gift sample from Sun Pharma Ltd, Ahmednagar. Polyethylene glycol 4000, Polyethylene glycol 6000, Methanol, Hydrochloric acid were purchased from LobaChem Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai. The disodium hydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate were obtained from SD Fine Chem limited, Mumbai, India. All other chemicals were used of analytical grades.

Preparation of solid dispersion by fusion method

Mesalamine and polymers were weighed accurately in different ratios (Table 1) and mixed for 15 min in a mortar and sieved through sieve number 100. Physical mixture was then heated on water bath upto melting point of pure drug. After melting, molten mass was dried and crushed after 24 hrs. Solid dispersion was collected for further characterization.

Preparation of solid dispersion by solvent evaporation method

Mesalamine and polymers were weighed accurately in various ratios (Table 1) and transferred to china dish containing sufficient quantity of methanol to dissolve. Methanol was evaporated on heating mantle at 400C. The resulting solid dispersions were stored for 24 hrs in desiccators. The mass obtained was crushed, pulverized. Finally, dispersions were passed through sieve number 100 and were stored in air tight containers till further use.9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Table 1

Formulation of solid dispersion

Sr. No

Polymer

Ratio

Method

Formulation code

1

1:1

FM41

2

PEG-4000

1:3

Fusion method

FM43

3

1:5

FM45

4

1:7

FM47

5

1:10

FM410

6

1:1

FM61

7

PEG-6000

1:3

FM63

8

1:5

FM65

9

1:7

FM67

10

1:10

FM610

11

1:1

SE41

12

PEG-4000

1:3

Solvent Evaporation Method

SE43

13

1:5

SE45

14

1:7

SE47

15

1:10

SE410

16

1:1

SE61

17

PEG-6000

1:3

SE63

18

1:5

SE65

19

1:7

SE67

20

1:10

SE610

Characterization of solid dispersion

Preformulation studies

In the preformulation study of drug, λ-max of Mesalamine in distilled water was found at 303 nm. Similarly Partition coefficient of Mesalamine was found to be 5.9 by shake flask method, which indicates that Mesalamine is lipophilic. So it can pass cell membrane easily once it got solubilized.

Percent practical yield

Percentage practical yield was calculated to know about percent yield or efficiency of method, thus it helps in selection of appropriate method for production. SDs were separately collected and weighed to determine practical yield from the following equation14

% Practical Yield=Practical Mass (Solid dispersion)Theoretical Mass (Drug+ Carrier)×100

Solubility studies

The solubility of drug is a very important physicochemical property because it directly affects the rate of drug release from formulation into the dissolution medium, bioavailability of the drug and consequently the therapeutic efficacy of the pharmaceutical product.

Solubility of drug and solid dispersions

An excess quantity of drug and solid dispersions was added separately to 5 ml distilled water in a volumetric flask with cap. The volumetric flasks were kept in a shaker at 37±0.5°C for 48 hours. The solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm Millipore filter and the filtrate was analyzed spectrophotometrically at 303 nm.

Detection of drug content in solid dispersions

Samples of prepared Mesalamine dispersions equivalent to 10mg of Mesalamine were accurately weighed, crushed and transferred to 10ml standard conical flask and the volume was made up to 10 ml with Phosphate buffer pH 6.8, filtered through Whatmann filter paper and absorbance was taken at 297.5 nm.15

Fourier transform infra red (FTIR) spectroscopy

Infra red studies was carried out to rule out interaction between drug and carrier used in formulation of solid dispersion by potassium bromide disc method using Infra red spectrophotometer (FTIR 8400S, Shimadzu, Japan). The scanning range was 500 to 4000 cm.1

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

Differential Scanning Calorimetry was performed to obtain suitable thermogram, using METTLER Toledo India Pvt. Ltd. The accurately weighed sample was placed in an aluminium pan and an empty aluminium pan was used as reference. The experiment was performed under Nitrogen flow, at a scanning rate 300C/min. in range of 50-3000C, whilst retaining the inert atmosphere.

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)

As a consequence of the importance of solid drug substance characterization, analytical tools such as X-ray diffractometry are usually employed in the pharmaceutical field. The detection of crystalline phases in mixed systems can be analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction. However, too much crystallinity causes brittleness and can decrease the solubility of the drug. The crystallinity parts give sharp narrow diffraction peaks and the amorphous component gives a very broad peak. The ratio between these intensities can be used to calculate the amount of crystallinity in the material.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed with 2 mg of pure drug and the solid dispersions were mounted on to the stubs using double sided adhesive tape and then coated with gold palladium alloy using fine coat ion sputter. The samples were subsequently analyzed under the scanning electron microscopy.

Dissolution studies

Dissolution studies are the most significant evaluation parameter for any solid dosage form. Dissolution study was carried out to determine the rate and extent of dissolution. The dissolution study of drug and solid dispersions was performed separately in 900ml Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at 37ºC+0.5ºC using the USP- I Basket Type apparatus at 50 rpm. Aliquots of 10 ml from the dissolution medium were withdrawn at 5 min time interval and replenished by an equal volume of fresh dissolution medium. The samples were filtered through whatman filter paper and analyzed by UV visible Spectrophotometer by measuring absorbance at 297.5 nm.

Stability study

Stability studies were carried out for selected formulations as per ICH guidelines (40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% RH). The selected solid dispersions were stored in stability chamber at 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% RH for 3 month and observed for the drug content at 1, 2, 3 months interval.

Results and Discussion

Solubility studies

Solubility data indicated that 67 μg/ml of pure Mesalamine was soluble in distilled water; hence they are considered as poorly water-soluble drugs. Here the solubility of drug in fusion and solvent evaporation method containing Mesalamine and polymers is depicted in Table 2. As compared to pure drug and fusion method, the solid dispersion prepared by solvent evaporation showed highest solubility 206.47 μg/ml in distilled water. This investigation suggested that, it might be possible due to preparation of solid dispersion using varying concentration of PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 which formed eutectic mixture and hence increase aqueous solubility of Mesalamine.

Percentage practical yield and drug content

In all formulations, the drug content was found to be between 82% and 102% and the practical yield was found to be between 86% and 96%. All the formulations of different ratio showed the presence of high drug content and low practical yieldTable 2 which indicates that the drug is uniformly dispersed in the powder and well loaded in the formulation. The high drug content or drug loading is the function of the characteristics of polymer, drug, surfactant and cross-linking agent, etc. Since the drug is hydrophobic in nature, there was less chance of diffusion of drug away from the polymer network during preparation.16, 17 The product yield depended upon the agglomeration and sticking of polymer to blades of stirrer and to the wall of the beaker during formulation. The solvent evaporation and fusion method used in this study appears to be suitable for formulation. It has been found that there is no significant drug or polymer loss during the solvent evaporation as well as fusion method.

Table 2

Solubility, % practical yield and % drug content of solid dispersion

Sr. No.

Formulation code

Ratio

Method

Solubility (μg/ml)

% practical yield

% Drug content

1

FM41

1:1

98.41

89

91.77

2

FM43

1:3

Fusion

102.12

88

86.47

3

FM45

1:5

Method

128.1

93.5

88.93

4

FM47

1:7

136.46

94.4

91.01

5

FM410

1:10

130.23

90.66

90.31

6

FM61

1:1

101.36

88.5

87.02

7

FM63

1:3

Fusion

113.3

94.48

90.54

8

FM65

1:5

Method

124.3

96.5

92.64

9

FM67

1:7

160.32

92.66

91.55

10

FM610

1:10

122.6

94.66

85.73

11

SE41

1:1

112.2

86.5

95.04

12

SE43

1:3

Solvent

133.7

88

91.79

13

SE45

1:5

Evaporation

153.5

90.5

101.9

14

SE47

1:7

Method

180.74

93

83.12

15

SE410

1:10

196.72

93.6

82.09

16

SE61

1:1

112.32

93.5

86.9

17

SE63

1:3

Solvent

141.21

96

85.03

18

SE65

1:5

Evaporation

148.31

94

90.06

19

SE67

1:7

Method

230.47

95

94.29

20

SE610

1:10

179.35

97

105.1

Figure 1

Solubility of mesalamine and selected solid dispersion

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image1.png

Fourier transform infra red (FTIR) spectroscopy

Infra-red spectrum of Mesalamine is shown in Figure 2. The characteristic peaks of functional groups presents in the drugs were checked and depicted in Table 3. The functional groups present in the structure of Mesalamine were identified correctly and hence the drugs was confirmed and considered for further uses.

The FTIR spectra of pure Mesalamine displayed bands at 2960 cm- 1 due to Ar-CH stretching at 1485, 1610 1446 cm-1 due to –C=C stretching, at 2600 cm-1 due to COOH stretching. The spectra also showed bands at 1750 cm-1 due to C=O stretching, at 3356 cm-1 due to NH2 stretching and 3486 cm-1 due to OH stretching Figure 2. The infrared spectrum of physical mixture of Mesalamine with PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 is shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 respectively. From the spectrum it was observed that chemical groups Ar-CH stretching, –C=C, COOH, NH2 stretching, OH stretching and C=O bending were found with the same wave number as that of Mesalamine Figure 2. The result with the FTIR indicates that there was no significant change in the principle peaks in pure drug.

Table 3

IR interpretation of mesalamine

Sr. No.

Compound

Frequency (cm-1)

Type of vibration

1.

Mesalamine

2960 (w)

Ar-CH str

1485, 1610 1446, (s)

C=C

2600 (b)

COOH str

1750 (s)

C=O str

3356 (m)

NH2str

3486 (m)

OH str

Figure 2

FTIR Spectrum of mesalamine

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image2.png
Figure 3

FTIR Spectrum of SE47

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image3.png
Figure 4

FTIR Spectrum of SE67

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image4.png

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)

The XRD diffractogram of Mesalamine and SDs are presented in figure 5, figure 6 and figure 7. The XRD spectra of Mesalamine showed various sharp and intense peaks at 89°, 111°, 199°, 221°, and 232.1° at a diffraction angle range of 5−50°, suggesting that Mesalamine was present in the crystalline form. The diffraction pattern of Mesalamine-SDs (SE47 and SE67) presented the complete disappearance of the characteristic peaks of Mesalamine. The disappearance of the characteristic peaks suggested that Mesalamine is completely dispersed in the PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 carrier and converted to the amorphous state. Only the characteristic peaks of the carrier were observed in the Mesalamine-SDs, which suggested the absence of any physical interaction between Mesalamine and PEG. However, there are some intense peaks observed at angles other than drug specific angles, which were because of the crystalline nature of the solid dispersion formers.

Figure 5

X-ray spectrum of mesalamine.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image5.png
Figure 6

X-ray spectrum of solid dispersion (SE47)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image6.png
Figure 7

X-ray spectrum of solid dispersion (SE67)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image7.png

Scanning electron microscopy

SEM photographs for pure drug and selected solid dispersion (SE47 and SE67) is shown in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 respectively. The drug crystals seemed to be smooth-surfaced, irregular in shape and size. In case of Solid dispersions, it was difficult to distinguish the presence of drug crystals. The drug surface in solid dispersion seems to be more porous in nature. Solid dispersions appeared as uniform and homogeneously mixed mass with wrinkled surface. Drug crystals appeared to be incorporated into the particles of the polymers. SEM picture images suggested that the surface properties of Mesalamine were lost during solvent evaporation and the formation of effective solid dispersion systems. These findings demonstrated that the drug was thoroughly mixed in the carriers with the negligible loss of little crystallinity.

Figure 8

SEM of mesalamine.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image8.png
Figure 9

SEM of solid dispersion (SE47)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image9.png
Figure 10

SEM of solid dispersion (SE67)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image10.png

Table 4

Dissolution study data of mesalamine and selected solid dispersion

Sr. No.

Time (min)

%cumulative drug release*

Pure drug (Mesalamine)

FM47

FM67

SE47

SE67

1.

0

0

0

0

0

0

2.

5

3.9±0.25

42.17±0.23

48.36±0.74

39.53±0.45

40.36±0.52

3.

10

10.7±0.85

45.3±0.53

55.32±1.2

40.23±0.85

39.32±0.42

4.

15

16.9±0.45

51.53±0.48

59.13±0.58

55.23±1.65

56.23±1.32

5.

20

24.6±0.68

60.81±0.23

65.28±0.48

61.45±0.35

60.56±0.85

6.

25

29.3±0.15

69.81±0.25

69.71±0.69

67.25±0.65

68.45±1.48

7.

30

34.7±0.95

74.48±0.35

78.16±0.77

72.51±0.78

74.55±1.25

8.

60

39.4±0.14

81.36±0.41

86.29±0.64

82.45±0.57

87.25±1.14

[i] * All values are expressed as mean ± SD, n=3

Figure 11

In-Vitro dissolution profiles of mesalamine and SDs prepared by fusion and solvent evaporation method in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at 37±0.5°C.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c4d92671-e934-45aa-bdd2-101cb9d2e966image11.png

Table 5

Stability study data of Formulation

Formulation code

Parameters

Storage at 40°C+2°C

0 Month

1 Month

2 Month

3 Month

FM47

% Drug content

91.01

90.88

90.56

90.30

FM67

% Drug content

91.55

90.77

90.37

90.20

SE47

% Drug content

83.12

83.00

82.77

82.44

SE67

% Drug content

94.29

94.19

93.77

93.22

Dissolution study

Dissolution studies were performed to compare the drug release from the solid dispersions, to that of the pure drug. The dissolution study was carried out for a period of 60 min in pH 6.8 Phosphate buffer. The drug release data obtained from selected solid dispersions FM47, FM67, SE47 and SE67 are tabulated inTable 4. It shows the cumulative percent drug released as a function of time for all formulations. The cumulative percent drug released after 60 min was depicted in Table 4. In vitro studies reveal that there is marked increase in the dissolution rate of Mesalamine from all the solid dispersions when compared to pure Mesalamine itself. From the in vitro drug release profile, it can be seen that all the selected formulations containing Mesalamine with PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 showed higher dissolution rate as compared with pure drug. The graphical presentation of dissolution profile of solid dispersion of Mesalamine over the period of 1 hr is shown inFigure 11.

Maximum drug released up to 10min was 55.32±1.2% with drug-carrier ratio (FM67). While over the period of 60 min, maximum drug was released from all selected formulations. This was might be due to absence of aggregation and agglomeration with crystalline drug, water-soluble carrier increased wetability and good dispersibility and conversion of drug to amorphous state. Less viscosity and good water holding capacity of carrier helps to dissolve the drug rapidly by increasing free kinetic energy. The graphical presentation of % cumulative drug release is shown inFigure 11. The literature reveals that the solvent evaporation method of solid dispersion solubilizes the drug and carrier in molecular level. Hence form eutectic mixture and increased solubility of poorly water soluble drug.

Kim et al. and Vilhelmsen et al. reported that the second generation solid dispersions were made using amorphous carriers, which are mostly polymers,18, 19 whereas the first generation solid dispersions were made using crystalline carriers. These form thermodynamically stable crystalline solid dispersions.19 In the 1960s, it was reported that amorphous solid dispersions were more effective than crystalline solid dispersions due to their thermodynamic stability.20, 21 Also Lloyd et al. and Pokharkar et al. demonstrated that drugs with low water solubility have higher solubility when they are in amorphous state rather than in crystalline state.22, 23 Theoretically, a certain amount of energy is demanded for breaking up the crystal lattice during the dissolution process if the drug is in its crystal state.24 However, amorphous drugs do not need such energy,25 making the drug more easily released.26 This improved drug release rate ultimately promotes drug’s bioavailability, making solid dispersions more ideal for administrating hydrophobic oral drugs.24 From the result, it was evident that using second generation polymer and its different percentage of concentration in solid dispersion is an advanced approach for immediate and prolonged release of poorly soluble drug than by using first generation polymer in solid dispersion which has immediate release. Moreover, in optimized condition/using third generation polymer (which include additional surface active properties e.g. inulin, inutec SP1, compritol 888 ATO, gelucire 44/14,poloxamer 407, etc., ) in the preparation of solid dispersion may be an advance technology for controlled release of poorly soluble drug than microsphere. Also, due to its easy preparation, solid dispersion would be one of the exciting frontiers of controlled release drug delivery systems.27, 28 Kim et al. reported some commercial applications of solid dispersion formulation using second generation polymer such as HPMC, PEG20000, PVP etc.24

Stability studies of the formulation

Solid dispersions showed maximum solubility and drug content were selected for stability studies. Selected formulations were stored at 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% RH for a period of 3 months. Formulation was evaluated at periodical intervals of 1 month for drug content. Drug loss was minor as observed after a month study. From the stability studies of the selected batch it was found that the solid dispersions remained stable even after exposing to stress conditions of temperature.

Conclusion

In the present study it was demonstrated that Mesalamine solid dispersions can be effectively produced by processing via fusion and solvent evaporation method with enhanced solubility and dissolution rate. PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 combinations were selected and stable SD systems were developed successfully. Utilization of PEG 4000 and PEG 6000 offers excellent possibilities to develop stable amorphous solid dispersion. Furthermore, this Mesalamine incorporated solid dispersion gave higher dissolution and solubility values compared to the pure Mesalamine drug. In vitro drug release studies of all selected formulations exhibited a cumulative release of almost 90% within 60 min. FTIR spectrum revealed that no chemical interaction occurred between the drug and excipients used in the formulation. Scanning electron microscopy studies suggested the conversion of crystalline Mesalamine to an amorphous form. The dissolution rate and solubility of Mesalamine solid dispersions was improved significantly using PEG 4000 and PEG 6000.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Mula Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Sonai for providing us with the moral support along with the facilities for research along with the other infrastructural facilities. Sun Pharma Ltd, Ahmednagar is gratefully acknowledged for providing Mesalamine as a gift sample.

References

1 

S H Khidre Effect of block copolymers on the dissolution of some water insoluble drugs, Part-1, nifedipine-pluronic f-127 solid dispersions system. Bull-pharm-sciassiut- univ, Bulletin-of-pharmaceutical sciences- assist-university199417816

2 

D S Kumar Solubility improvement using solid dispersion, strategy, mechanism and characteristics, responsiveness and prospect way outsInt Res J Pharm20112115560

3 

D Sharma M Soni S Kumar G D Gupta Solubility Enhancement Eminent Role in Poorly Soluble DrugsRes J Pharm Technol2009143220410.5958/0974-360X

4 

L Jejurkar K K Tapar Preparation and characterization of mesalamine solid dispersions by kneading methodInt J Pharma Sci Res201132231421

5 

T F Vasconcelos B Sarmento P Costa Solid dispersion as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugsDrug Discov Today20071214106875

6 

V Kamalakkannan A Puratchikody K Masilamani B Senthilnathan Solubility enhancement of poorly soluble drugs by solid dispersion technique A reviewJ Pharm Res201032231421

7 

M A Aleem Solid Dispersion - an Approach to Enhance the Dissolution rate of Aceclofenac [dissertation] Karnataka, Bangalore. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science200615http://52.172.27.147:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2125/1/CDPCEUT00033.pdf

8 

G V Betageri K R Makarla Enhancement of Dissolution of Glyburide by Solid Dispersion and Lyophilization TechniquesInt J Pharm19951261556010.1016/0378-5173(95)04114-1

9 

G Poovi U M Dhanalekshmi N Narayanan Preparation and characterization of repaglinide loaded chitosan polymeric nanoparticlesRes J Nanosci Nanotechnol2011111224

10 

T K Giri K Kumar A Alexander A novel and alternative approach to controlled release drug delivery system based on solid dispersion techniqueBull Fac Pharm Cairo Univ20125021475910.1016/j.bfopcu.2012.07.002

11 

R B Patel U R Patel M C Rogge Bioavailability of hydrochlorothiazide from tablets and suspensionsJ Pharm Sci19847333596110.1002/jps.2600730317

12 

W K Sietsema The absolute oral bioavailability of selected drugsInt J Clin Pharmcol Ther Toxicol1989274179211

13 

L S Wan P W Heng L F Wong Relationship between swelling and drug release in a hydrophilic matrixDrug Dev Ind Pharm19931912011010.3109/03639049309063012

14 

H Konno T Handa D E Alonzo Effect of polymer type on the dissolution profile of amorphous solid dispersion containing felodipineEur J Pharm Biopharm2008702493910.1016/j.ejpb.2008.05.023

15 

T F Vasconcelos B Sarmento P Costa Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugsDrug Discov Today2007232410687510.1016/j.drudis.2007.09.005

16 

M D Dhanaraju S Elizabeth G Poovi Dexamethasone release from glutaraldehyde cross-linking chitosan microspheres: in vitro/in vivo studies and non-clinical parameters response in rat arthritic modelJ Pharm Investig20114152798810.4333/KPS.2011.41.5.279

17 

M D Blanco C Gomez R Olmo Chitosan microspheres in PLG films as devices for cytarabine releaseInt J Pharm20002021-2293910.1016/s0378-5173(00)00408-7

18 

T Vilhelmsen H Eliasen T Schaefer Effect of a melt agglomeration process on agglomerates containing solid dispersionsInt J Pharm20053031-21324210.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.07.012

19 

A B Nighute S B Bhise Preparation and evaluation of rifabutin loaded polymeric microspheresRes J Pharm Technol2009223714

20 

W L Chiou S Riegelman Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systemsJ Pharm Sci19716091281130210.1002/jps.2600600902

21 

A P Simonelli S C Mehta W I Higuchi Dissolution rates of high energy polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-sulfathiazole coprecipitatesJ Pharm Sci19695855384910.1002/jps.2600580503

22 

G R Lloyd D Q Craig A Smith A calorimetric investigation into the interaction between paracetamol and polyethylene glycol 4000 in physical mixes and solid dispersionsEur J Pharm Biopharm1999481596510.1016/s0939-6411(99)00022-3

23 

V B Pokharkar L P Mandpe M N Padamwar Development, characterization and stabilization of amorphous form of a low T-g drugPowder Technol2006167120510.1016/j.powtec.2006.05.012

24 

K T Kim J Y Lee M Y Lee Solid dispersions as a drug delivery systemJ Pharm Investig201141312542

25 

R Ghaste D D Chougule R R Shah Solid dispersions: an overviewPharm Rev2009713

26 

L S Taylor G Zografi Spectroscopic characterization of interactions between PVP and indomethacin in amorphous molecular dispersionsPharm Res199714121691810.1023/a:1012167410376

27 

T F Vasconcelos B Sarmento P Costa Solid dispersion as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugsDrug Discov Today20071223-2410687510.1016/j.drudis.2007.09.005

28 

C W Pouton Formulation of poorly water soluble drugs for oral administration: Physicochemical and physiological issues and the lipid formulation classification systemEur J Pharm SCi2006293-42788710.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.016



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 19-07-2021

Accepted : 07-09-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jpbs.2021.018


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 978

PDF Downloaded: 1097