- Visibility 17 Views
- Downloads 7 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.jpbs.2021.005
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Allelopathic potential of croton bonplandianus bail
- Author Details:
-
H.S. Patil *
-
Rajesh Sharma
Introduction
Baramati region is considered as semiarid, because of rain shadow effect[1], in which different types of native and invasive weeds have been observed in different crop ecosystems causing about 16 to 58 % yield losses due to their allelopathic impact.[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] The phytosociological survey revealed that invasive weeds such as Tridax, Acanthospermum, Ageratum and Flaveria exhibiting xeric features while Cassia uniflora, Croton and Lantana showing adaptations to semiarid crop ecosystems have become dominant. Similarly, Alternanthera, Asclepias, Parthenium and Xanthium were dominant in irrigated crop ecosystems. Considering the dominance of these weeds among major crops like mung bean, pearlmillet and sunflower cultivated in semiarid agro-ecosystem, the allelopathic influence of highly dominant (as per our survey) Croton bonplandianus was undertaken, on sensitive crop like mung bean which is close associated to this weed. As recorded previousl[12] the allelochemicals released from the donor plants affect the growth and functioning of receptor species, therefore the present investigation was undertaken to know the allelopathic impact of Croton on mung bean.
Croton bonplandianus is an obnoxious weed belonging to family Euphorbiaceae. This plant is native from tropical South America. It has become dominant due to its wide adaptability, deep root system, most efficient and effective seed dispersal, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and production of some novel allelochemicals.[7],[23] The detailed allelopathic effects of Croton bonplandianus on the crops and native weeds have not been studied in India.[24] Hence, the aim of this work was to do a survey of dominant weeds in the region and then to determine, if the most dominant weed may have an allelopathic effect on the associated crop.





Botanical name |
Local name |
Common english name |
Family |
*Acanthospermum hispidum DC. |
Germankata |
German prick |
Asteraceae |
Achyranthes aspera L. |
Aghada |
Pricklychafflow |
Amaranthaceae |
Ageratum conyzoides L. |
Mahakaua |
Goatweed |
Asteraceae |
*Ageratum conyzoides, L. |
Osadi |
Goat weed |
Asteraceae |
*Alternanthera tenella Veldk. |
Reshimkata |
Jacob’s coat |
Amaranthaceae |
*Argemone mexicana L. |
Piwala Dhodtra |
Prickly poppy |
Papaveraceae |
*Asclepias curassavica L. |
Haladkunku |
Bastard ipecacuanha |
Asclepiadaceae |
Cassia tora L. |
Takala |
Sicklepod |
Fabaceae |
*Cassia uniflora, Mill. |
Senna |
Foetid senna |
Fabaceae |
*Celosia agrentia L. |
Kurdu |
Cock’s comb |
Amaranthaceae |
Cleome viscose L. |
Pivli-tilwan |
Spiderflower |
Cleomaceae |
Commelina benghalensis L. |
Kena |
Dayflower |
Commelinaceae |
*Croton bonplandianus Baill. |
- |
Cascarilla |
Euphorbiaceae |
*Cryptostegia grandiflora R.Br. |
Kawali |
African rubber |
Asclepiadaceae |
Cynodon dactylon Pers. |
Harali |
Bermuda grass |
Poaceae |
Cyperus rothundus L. |
Nagarmotha |
Purple nutsedge |
Cyperaceae |
Digera arvensis Forsk. |
Karigandhari |
Kanjero |
Amaranthaceae |
*Euphorbia antiquorum L. |
Ransher |
Prickly spurge |
Euphorbiaceae |
Euphorbia geniculata Orteg. |
Dudhani |
Spurge |
Euphorbiaceae |
Euphorbia hirta L. |
Bari-dudhi |
Small spurge |
Euphorbiaceae |
*Flaveria trinervia C.Mohr. |
German |
-- |
Asteraceae |
Indigofera linifolia Retz. |
Pandharphalli |
Indigo |
Fabaceae |
*Ipomoea carnea Jacq. |
Besharam |
Indian jalap |
Convolvulaceae |
Lagasca mollis Cav. |
Jharvad |
Softheaded flower |
Asteraceae |
*Lantana camara L. |
Ghaneri |
Yellow sage |
Verbenaceae |
*Martynia annua L. |
Vinchu |
Devil’s claw |
Pedaliaceae |
Oxalis corniculata L. |
Amboshi |
Lady’s sorrel |
Oxalidaceae |
*Parthenium hysterophorus L. |
Gajargawat |
Congress grass |
Asteraceae |
Peristrophe bicalyculata Ness. |
Chikni |
-- |
Acanthaceae |
Portulaca oleracea L. |
Gholu |
Purslane |
Portulaceae |
*Prosopis julifera DC. |
Kubabhul |
Agaroba |
Mimosaceae |
Trianthema portulacastrum L. |
Biskhapra |
Purselane |
Ficoidae |
*Tridax procumbens L. |
Ekadandi |
Coat buttons |
Asteraceae |
Vernonia cinerea Less. |
Sahadevi |
Ironweed |
Asteraceae |
Withania somnifera Dunal. |
Ashwagandha |
Wintercherry |
Solanaceae |
*Xanthium indicum, L. |
Landga |
Dot cocklebur/burweed |
Asteraceae |
Name of the weed |
Density/m2 |
% frequency |
Abundance |
Croton bonplandianus Baill.. |
10.1 |
70 |
14.4 |
Achyranthes aspera, L. |
1.7 |
40 |
2.2 |
Bidens pilosa, L. |
2.3 |
30 |
1.3 |
Oxalis corniculata, L. |
3.8 |
50 |
3.2 |
Tephrosia purpurea, Pers. |
3.4 |
50 |
4.3 |
Vernonia sineria,Less. |
1.3 |
10 |
5.1 |
Boerhaavia diffusa,L. |
4.2 |
20 |
3.4 |
Digera arvensis, Forsk. |
2.3 |
40 |
3.6 |
Tridax procumbens, L. |
6.8 |
60 |
5.2 |
Portulaca oleracea, L. |
3.2 |
30 |
4.3 |
Cyperus rotundus, L. |
3.4 |
20 |
4.2 |
Cynadon dactylon, Pers. |
4.3 |
50 |
5.1 |
Plant part |
Conc. of extracts (%) |
Germination (%) |
Root length (cm) |
Shoot length (cm) |
Vigour index |
Dry wt. of 10 seedlings (g) |
Control |
100 |
6.0 |
5.9 |
1190.0 |
0.346 |
|
Leaf |
5 |
40.00 |
2.0 |
5.8 |
312.0 |
0.332 |
10 |
30.00 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
210.0 |
0.307 |
|
15 |
0.00 |
00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Root |
5 |
90.00 |
4.06 |
9.2 |
1193.4 |
0.319 |
10 |
85.00 |
3.7 |
12.9 |
1411.0 |
0.313 |
|
15 |
80.00 |
3.3 |
12.2 |
1240.0 |
0.301 |
|
20 |
70.00 |
2.4 |
10.2 |
882.0 |
0.296 |
|
CD at 5% |
7.44 |
0.66 |
1.21 |
150.71 |
0.29 |
|
SEM |
3.21 |
0.31 |
0.75 |
71.13 |
0.014 |
|
CV |
7.21 |
13.46 |
10.42 |
10.91 |
6.74 |
Plant part |
Conc. of leachates (%) |
Germination (%) |
Root length (cm) |
Shoot length (cm) |
Vigour index |
Dry wt. of 10 seedlings (g) |
Control |
100 |
6.0 |
5.9 |
1190.0 |
0.346 |
|
Leaf |
5 |
90 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
711.0 |
0.420 |
10 |
40 |
1.5 |
3.2 |
188.0 |
0.403 |
|
15 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
0.00 |
00 |
|
20 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
0.00 |
00 |
|
Root |
5 |
90 |
5.7 |
7.5 |
1188.0 |
0.346 |
10 |
90 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
999.0 |
0.314 |
|
15 |
80 |
3.8 |
6.2 |
800.0 |
0.140 |
|
20 |
70 |
3.3 |
5.5 |
616.00 |
0.101 |
|
CD at 5% |
8.14 |
0.59 |
0.45 |
106.02 |
0.034 |
|
SEM |
3.83 |
0.28 |
0.22 |
50.01 |
0.016 |
|
CV |
7.38 |
10.67 |
5.85 |
9.26 |
7.51 |
Treatments |
Germination (%) |
Root length (cm) |
Shoot length (cm) |
Vigour index |
Control |
90.20±3.83 a |
4.52±0.32 b |
9.06±0.37 c |
1227.03±114.59 b |
Soil leachates 20% |
80.00±4.12 b |
3.80±0.12 c |
8.70±0.44 c |
1001.86±96.59 c |
Soil leachates 50% |
70.00±5.10 c |
3.44±0.18 d |
6.94±0.49 d |
729.31±99.54 d |
Control soil |
95.00±3.16 a |
5.52±0.17 a |
10.20±0.32 a |
1494.66±96.94 a |
Rhizosphere soil |
80.00±5.10 b |
4.23±0.26 b |
9.63±0.49 b |
1111.85±130.55 bc |
p-value$ |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
No. of Peaks |
Rf |
AUC |
% Area |
1 |
0.06 |
164.1 |
5.11 |
2 |
0.13 |
3.8 |
0.12 |
3 |
0.22 |
106.4 |
3.31 |
4 |
0.40 |
176.6 |
5.50 |
5 |
0.46 |
13.6 |
0.42 |
6 |
0.51 |
1380.5 |
42.96 |
7 |
0.61 |
381.1 |
11.86 |
8 |
0.79 |
762.5 |
23.73 |
9 |
0.89 |
69.6 |
2.17 |
10 |
0.95 |
155.3 |
4.83 |
Materials and Methods
An extensive ecological survey was carried out in and around Baramati Tahsil, during 2016-2019 and the dominant weed species growing in cultivated fields and fallow lands were identified with the help of The Flora of Presidency of Bombay, Flora of Kolhapur District,[25] Flora of Maharashtra, . For phytosociological studies, list count quadrat method was followed.[21]
Preparation of extracts and leachates
Croton bonplandianus was selected as a donor allelopathic invasive weed and mung bean (Vigna radiata L. var. Vaibhav) was selected as test crop. The aqueous extracts of Croton bonplandianus were prepared from 100 g fresh leaves and roots after crushing in 500 ml of distilled water and filtered through Buchner funnel using Whatman No.1 filter paper. These extracts were stored as stock solutions (20%) in amber coloured bottles, which were diluted with distilled water to make desired concentrations (5% to 20%). For preparation of leachates of leaves and roots, 100g shade dried material was soaked in 500 ml of distilled water for 48 hours at 27±2 º C and the leachates were filtered through Buchner funnel using Whatman filter paper No.1. These leachates were stored as stock solutions (20%), and diluted with distilled water as mentioned above to make different concentrations (5% to 20%).
Collection of rhizosphere soil and Preparation of its leachates
About 500g of rhizosphere soil of Croton bonplandianus was collected randomly from the field to the depth of 15 — 20cm. The soil samples were cleaned, powdered and mixed to make a composite sample. 20g and 50g of this soil sample were suspended separately in 100ml distilled water. The solutions were stirred properly and kept for 48 hrs. These were filtered through Buchner funnel using Whatman filter paper No.1. The filtrates (20% and 50%) were used for seed germination bioassay along with control. Similar studies were carried out with rhizosphere soil directly and control soil (not having any vegetation).
Seed germination bioassay
The seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. var. Vaibhav) were procured from College of Agriculture, Pune (M.S. India). The healthy seeds were used for bioassay studies using sterilized Petri-plates (9cm diameter) lined with special type of seed germination paper. The seeds were surface sterilized with 0.02% aqueous HgCl2 for two minutes and thoroughly washed with distilled water. The germination papers in Petri plates were moistened with 10 ml of respective concentrations of leaf and root extracts and leachates of Croton bonplandianus. The seeds placed in Petri plates moistened with distilled water were considered as control. Each Petri plate containing 10 seeds were kept in triplicate at room temperature (27+2oC) wrapped in black paper to avoid direct sunlight. Seed germination percentage, root and shoot length, vigour index, root: shoot ratio, fresh and dry weight of seedlings were recorded on 7th DAS.[8]
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed statistically using ANOVA test. All the calculations were made by using (Sigma stat 3.5) and Microsoft Excel (office 2003).
Results and Discussion
Phytosociological studies on weeds of baramati tahsil, dist. Pune.
Results recorded in [Table 1] revealed that about 36 weed species were dominant in irrigated, semi-arid crop ecosystems and fallow lands. Amongst these about 50% of the dominant weeds were of exotic nature. These results have clearly indicated very high rate of invasion of non-native weeds in this region. Similar results were reported by some other workers.[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [26], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [24], [27], [28], [23], [29], [30] The phytosociological survey of dominant weeds had given an alarming indication about the invasion rate of non-natives in this region. If their invasion is not controlled effectively, they may substitute and reduce the diversity of natives. These invasive alien species (IAS) may be responsible to degrade the crop ecosystems in this region, causing significant yield reduction.[17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [24], [27], [28]
Croton bonplandianus was the weed with highest density (10.1 /m2), frequency (70%) and abundance(14.4) in the field, followed by Tridax procumbens and Cynodon dactyl on [Table 2].
Seed Germination Bioassays
Effects of rhizosphere soil and its leachates
The results presented in [Table 5] clearly indicated the inhibition of seed germination percentage with 20% and 50% soil leachates over control in mungbean. The seed germination bioassay conducted in rhizosphere soil had also shown considerable reduction in seed germination percentage, root and shoot length and thereby vigour index as compared to control. This has confirmed that the rhizosphere soil leachates and the soil itself had negative influence on seed germination and seedling growth. The different allelochemicals existing in the weed might be leaching into the soil from the whole plant and exuding from the roots. These may accumulate in the soil and affect seed germination and seedling growth of recipient plant species.[9] A similar trend was reported by other workers.[31]
Effects of leaf and root extracts
Inhibitory effects of leaf and root extracts of Croton on seed germination and seedling growth were recorded in mung bean at higher concentrations (15, 20%). The root and shoot length of seedlings was also reduced significantly along with vigour index and dry wt. of seedlings with increasing concentrations of leaf and root extracts[Table 3].
Effects of leaf and root leachates
The leachates of Croton leaves significantly affected seed germination percentage and seedling growth in mung bean. The leaf leachates have caused full suppression of vigour index at higher concentrations (15, 20%), whilst at lower concentration (5%) stimulatory effects were recorded. Similarly, root leachates also showed positive effects on seed germination and seedling growth at lower concentration treatments while at higher concentration there was inhibition[Table 4].
Similar inhibitory allelopathic effects of Parthenium leaves on germination and seedling vigour of sunflower were reported.[24] The allelopathic impact of extracts or leachates is more harmful to radicle.[3], [4]The level of phytotoxicity was directly proportional to concentration of leachates.[6], [7], [8], [9], [10] The results of present investigation are in agreement with the above workers. The vigour index indicates the allelopathic effects on seedling establishment same was the trend in present study.
The successful invasion and dominance of Croton over native weed species might be due to different allelochemicals existing in it. Present studies may help for understanding crop weed interaction in semiarid agro ecosystem of Baramati Tahsil.
Source of Funding
UGC for providing financial support
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- D N Sen. Environment and plant life in Indian desertGeobios International. 1982. [Google Scholar]
- S S Deokule, S Y Kamble. Weeds of irrigated and non irrigated agricultural fields of Baramati area in Pune district. J Econ Taxonomic Bot 1984. [Google Scholar]
- J S Duhan, K S Laxminarayana. Allelopathic effects of Acacia nilotica on cereal and legume crops grown in fields. Allelopathy J 1995. [Google Scholar]
- J Friedman. Allelopathy autotoxicity and germination In: seed development and germination. 1995. [Google Scholar]
- N A Ghayal, K N Dhumal. Ecophysiological and allelopathic variations ininvasive and native weed species. Int Symp Biol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- N Ghayal, K Dhuma. Phytotoxic effects of Cassia uniflora leaf leachates on germination and seedling growth of Radish ( Raphanus sativus, L.) and mustard ( Brassica juncea). Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2013. [Google Scholar]
- G Grummer. Die gegenseitige beeinflussung hohere pflanzen allolopathie. 1953. [Google Scholar]
- V Gupta, A Kak, B B Singh. Studies on seed germination and seedling vigour in liquorice G. galbra). J Med Aromatic Plant Sci 1996. [Google Scholar]
- B Hamdi, Inderjit, M Olofsdotter, J C Streibig. Laboratory Bioassay for Phytotoxicity. Agronomy J 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- H Ali, S Kumar, M K Abdulla, G Sindhu, A Sindhu. Allelopathic effect of Amaranthus viridis L. and Parthenium hysterophorus, L. on wheat, maize and rice. Allelopathy J 2005. [Google Scholar]
- J E Hodge, B T Hofreiter. Integration of physical and chemical treatment on the extraction of starch from Canna edulis Ker. rhizome. J Agricultural Sci 1962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Inderjit. Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot Rev 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- B B Jadhav. Allelopathic effects of leaf leachates of different tree species. 2003. [Google Scholar]
- S S Jadhav. Allelopathic potential of some dominant aquatic weeds of Mula and Mutha River and their bioprospecting. Int Conf Plant Mar Environ Sci 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- R Kaushal, K S Verma, K N Singh. Allelopathic effects of Grewia optiva and Populus deltoides on germination and seedling growth of some major field crops. International Congress of Plant Physiology 2003. [Google Scholar]
- M Kumari, S Das, Y Vimla, P Aarora. Physiological parameters governing drought tolerance in maize. Indian J Plant Physiol 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Kelly A. Lee, Kirk C. Klasing. A role for immunology in invasion biology. Trends Ecol Evol 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- O Lowry, N J Rosebrough, A L Farr, R J Randall. PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT. J Biol Chem 1951. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- R C Magarey, J I Bull. Effect Of Soil Pasteurisation And Mancozeb On Growth Of Sugarcane And Apple Seedlings In Sugarcane Yield Decline And Apple Replant Disease Soils. Acta Horticulturae 1994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- G L Miller. Use of dinitro salicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- R Mishra. Diversity, Invasion Status and Usages of Alien Plant Species in Northeastern Hilly State of Tripura: A Confluence of Indo-Barman Hotspot. Am J Plant Sci 1968. [Google Scholar]
- C V Murumkar, D K Magdum. Ecophysiological studies in some weeds of Baramati. Acts Societatis Bot Poloniale 1996. [Google Scholar]
- S L Peng, Y C Xiang. The invasion of exotic plants and effects on ecosystems. Acta Ecologia Sin 1999. [Google Scholar]
- P Oudhia. Allelopathic effects of some obnoxious weeds on germination of soybean. Indian J Plant Physiol 2000. [Google Scholar]
- S R Yadav, M M Sardesai. Flora of Kolhapur District. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- R K Kohli, D Batish, H P Singh. Allelopathy and its implications in agro ecosystems. J Crop Production 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- S M Pandya. Role of Allelopathy in crop weed interactions: priority and prospects. 1994. [Google Scholar]
- H S Patil, K N Dhumal. Ecophysiological and biochemical investigations ion some invasive weeds of semiarid agroecosystem. Int Symp Biol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- V S Rao. Principles of Weed Science. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- V N Saraswat. Weeds: Their ecology and control. In: Integrated pest and disease management APH Publishing Corporation. 1998. [Google Scholar]
- M K Schon, F A Einhellig. Allelopathic Effects of Cultivated Sunflower on Grain Sorghum. univ Chicago press j 1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Preparation of extracts and leachates
- Collection of rhizosphere soil and Preparation of its leachates
- Seed germination bioassay
- Statistical Analysis
- Results and Discussion
- Seed Germination Bioassays
- Effects of rhizosphere soil and its leachates
- Effects of leaf and root extracts
- Effects of leaf and root leachates
- Source of Funding
- Conflict of Interest